tezvyn:

Site-to-Site VPN vs dedicated interconnect

Source: interviewadvanced

WHAT IT TESTS: hybrid connectivity tradeoffs. OUTLINE: VPN is quick, cheap, encrypted over public internet with variable latency; Direct Connect or ExpressRoute is a private dedicated link with consistent low latency, high bandwidth, longer lead time and…

WHAT IT TESTS: whether you can weigh hybrid connectivity options on cost, latency consistency, bandwidth, and provisioning time. ANSWER OUTLINE: a Site-to-Site VPN tunnels encrypted traffic over the public internet, is fast to stand up and cheap but inherits the internet's variable latency and limited throughput. A dedicated interconnect like Direct Connect or ExpressRoute is a private physical circuit with consistent low latency, high bandwidth, and stronger SLAs, but costs more and takes weeks to provision.

Read the original → interview

Get five bites like this every day.

Tezvyn delivers a daily feed of 60-second tech bites with quizzes to lock in what you learn.

Site-to-Site VPN vs dedicated interconnect · Tezvyn