Truth in Advertising: Claims Must Be Substantiated
Don't just say it, prove it. Advertising claims must be truthful, not misleading, and substantiated with evidence *before* you publish. This applies to all ads, from product performance claims to influencer endorsements.
WHY IT EXISTS: To protect consumers and maintain a fair marketplace, regulators like the FTC require that businesses compete on the merits of their products, not on their ability to make deceptive claims. This prevents a race to the bottom where the most dishonest advertiser wins.
THE MENTAL MODEL: Think of it as "show your work." Before you make a factual claim in an ad, you must have the proof on hand. The burden of proof is on the advertiser, not the consumer. Your ad is a conclusion; the FTC can ask to see the underlying data that led you to it.
HOW IT WORKS: The FTC's standard has three main parts. First, ads must be truthful and not deceptive. Deception can be an outright lie or simply omitting a key piece of information. Second, claims must be substantiated, meaning you have a "reasonable basis" for them before the ad runs. For health or safety, this often requires scientific evidence. Third, ads must not be unfair, meaning they don't cause substantial, unavoidable harm to consumers.
WHEN TO USE IT: This framework applies to all commercial speech in any medium, including digital ads, social media, and influencer marketing. If you're making an objective claim about a product's features, performance, or benefits, these rules apply. For example, claiming your battery lasts "10 hours" requires testing to prove it.
WHEN NOT TO USE IT: The rules don't apply to subjective claims or "puffery." These are exaggerated, opinion-based statements that no reasonable consumer would take as a literal, objective fact. Saying you have the "best-tasting soda in the world" is puffery. Saying your soda has "half the sugar of competitors" is a factual claim that requires substantiation.
ONE CANONICAL EXAMPLE: A company claims its app uses a "revolutionary AI algorithm." The FTC could demand substantiation. If the "AI" is just a series of if-else statements, the claim is deceptive. Similarly, an influencer posting about a product without disclosing they were paid is also making a deceptive endorsement.
Read the original → ftc.gov
Get five bites like this every day.
Tezvyn delivers a daily feed of 60-second tech bites with quizzes to lock in what you learn.