tezvyn:

☁️DevOps & Cloud

Infrastructure, containers, CI/CD, and cloud

1161 bites

More in DevOps & Cloud — page 7

Monitoring & SRE87 sec read

Explain the three pillars of observability

WHAT IT TESTS: practical command of metrics, logs, and traces. OUTLINE: metrics are cheap aggregated time series for detecting and alerting, logs are discrete event records for detail and context, traces follow one request across services to localize latency.

Monitoring & SRE2 min read

Error budget policy across dependent microservices?

WHAT IT TESTS: SLO design in a dependency graph. OUTLINE: set per-service SLOs but anchor on user-facing journey SLOs, budget for dependency error via the multiplication of availabilities, attribute downstream-caused failures correctly, and use…

Monitoring & SRE2 min read

SRE vs traditional ops on a recurring alert?

WHAT IT TESTS: whether you grasp the software-engineering mindset of SRE. OUTLINE: traditional ops repeatedly handles the alert manually and scales by adding people; SRE treats it as a bug, automates or eliminates the root cause, and scales sublinearly.

Monitoring & SRE89 sec read

Risky launch with a near-empty error budget?

WHAT IT TESTS: balancing business risk against reliability with engineering controls. OUTLINE: contain blast radius via canary and feature flags, use progressive rollout tied to budget burn, negotiate explicit risk acceptance, add fast rollback.

Monitoring & SRE86 sec read

What makes a blameless postmortem effective?

WHAT IT TESTS: understanding of postmortem structure and the psychology of blamelessness. OUTLINE: cover summary, impact, timeline, root cause, action items; explain blameless means focusing on systemic causes so people report honestly.

Monitoring & SRE86 sec read

How do you find and eliminate toil systematically?

WHAT IT TESTS: a measurable, prioritized approach to reducing operational toil. OUTLINE: inventory and measure toil via time tracking or ticket analysis, prioritize by frequency times cost versus automation effort, automate highest-ROI items, measure success…

Monitoring & SRE86 sec read

Error budget exhausted early: what now?

WHAT IT TESTS: whether you use the error budget as a decision tool, not punishment. OUTLINE: invoke the error budget policy, shift focus from features to reliability, prioritize stability work, analyze what burned the budget.

Monitoring & SRE88 sec read

How do you set SLOs for a service from scratch?

WHAT IT TESTS: a disciplined, user-centric process for defining reliability targets. OUTLINE: identify critical user journeys, pick SLIs that reflect user happiness, measure current performance, set achievable targets with buffer, iterate.

Monitoring & SRE78 sec read

How do SRE and DevOps relate?

WHAT IT TESTS: whether you see SRE as a concrete implementation of DevOps principles, not a rival. OUTLINE: DevOps is a broad culture of breaking down silos; SRE is one prescriptive way to do it with specific practices.

Monitoring & SRE83 sec read

SLI vs SLO vs SLA: how do they relate?

WHAT IT TESTS: command of the core reliability vocabulary. OUTLINE: SLI is a measured metric, SLO is the internal target for that metric, SLA is the external contract with consequences.

Monitoring & SRE78 sec read

What defines toil, with an example?

WHAT IT TESTS: whether you can identify operational work worth automating away. OUTLINE: define toil as manual, repetitive, automatable, tactical, no-enduring-value, scaling-with-growth work; distinguish it from overhead; give a concrete example.

Monitoring & SRE81 sec read

Normalization of Deviance

Normalization of deviance is the gradual process by which unsafe practices become accepted as normal because they have not yet caused a visible failure. Each tolerated shortcut lowers the bar, eroding safety margins until a catastrophe finally results.

Monitoring & SRE80 sec read

Hiring for SRE

Hiring for SRE seeks engineers who blend software-development skill with systems and operations depth, plus strong debugging and incident temperament. The hardest part is finding people who can both write automation and reason about failure at scale under…

Monitoring & SRE79 sec read

LitmusChaos

LitmusChaos is an open-source, Kubernetes-native chaos engineering platform that runs fault experiments as custom resources. It injects failures like pod kills, network latency, and resource stress to validate that services stay resilient under real-world…

Monitoring & SRE79 sec read

Backpressure

Backpressure is a mechanism by which a slow consumer signals an upstream producer to slow down or stop, preventing unbounded queues and resource exhaustion. It keeps systems stable under overload by propagating capacity limits backward through a pipeline.

Monitoring & SRE77 sec read

Performance Profiling

Profiling measures where a program actually spends its time and resources, attributing CPU cycles, memory, or wall-clock latency to specific functions or call paths. It replaces guesswork with data so optimization effort targets the real bottleneck.

Monitoring & SRE74 sec read

Review of Reviews (Postmortem Metrics)

A meta-process that audits the quality and follow-through of postmortems themselves, tracking metrics like action-item completion, time-to-close, and recurrence of incidents.

Monitoring & SRE2 min read

The Second Story of an Incident

The first story blames human error and stops there; the second story asks why the action made sense to the person at the time and what systemic conditions enabled it. Seeking the second story is the heart of blameless, learning-oriented incident analysis.

Monitoring & SRE2 min read

Counterfactual Reasoning in Incident Analysis

Counterfactual reasoning asks what would have prevented or mitigated an incident: if this alert had existed, if this check had run. Used well it finds systemic gaps, but it is a trap when it implies a single person should have just acted differently in…

Monitoring & SRE2 min read

Actionable Remediation Items

Actionable remediation items are specific, owned, trackable follow-ups from a postmortem that prevent recurrence or improve response. Good ones are concrete and assigned with a due date; vague items like be more careful are non-actionable and predictably…