LTV to CAC Ratio: Is Your Growth Profitable?
The LTV to CAC ratio measures if you make more money from a customer than you spent to get them. It's the core health metric for a subscription business, used to judge marketing efficiency. A ratio above 3:1 is often healthy.
WHY IT EXISTS: To answer a critical business question: 'Is the money we spend to get new customers worth it in the long run?' Without this, a company could spend 100 to acquire customers who only ever pay them 50, leading to bankruptcy despite high growth. The LTV/CAC ratio provides a single metric to gauge the long-term profitability of customer acquisition.
THE MENTAL MODEL: Think of it like investing in an asset. Your Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) is the price you pay for the asset (the customer). The Lifetime Value (LTV) is the total return that asset generates over its life. The LTV to CAC ratio is your return on investment. A 3:1 ratio means for every 1 you spend to get a customer, you expect to get 3 back over their lifetime.
HOW IT WORKS: You calculate two numbers. First, CAC: sum up all your sales and marketing expenses (salaries, ad spend, tools) in a period and divide by the number of new customers acquired in that period. Second, LTV: calculate the average revenue per customer, multiplied by your gross margin, and then project that over the customer's lifetime (often calculated using churn rate). The ratio is simply LTV divided by CAC.
WHEN TO USE IT: Use this ratio to evaluate the health of a subscription or repeat-purchase business model. It's essential for prioritizing marketing channels; for example, if Google Ads yield a 4:1 ratio and Facebook Ads yield a 2:1, you should shift budget to Google. It's also a key metric for fundraising, as it demonstrates the business's potential for profitable scale.
WHEN NOT TO USE IT: Be cautious with early-stage companies. LTV is a projection and can be wildly inaccurate with little historical data or high churn. The ratio is also less meaningful for businesses with one-off, high-ticket sales where 'lifetime value' is just a single transaction. In those cases, focusing on transaction-level profit margin is more direct.
ONE CANONICAL EXAMPLE: A SaaS company spends 1,000,000 on sales and marketing in a quarter and acquires 1,000 new customers. Their CAC is 1,000. Their average customer pays 100/month and stays for 36 months, with a gross margin of 80%. The LTV is (100 * 36) * 0.80 = 2,880. The LTV to CAC ratio is 2,880 / $1,000 = 2.88. This is a 2.9:1 ratio, indicating a borderline-healthy but not yet stellar acquisition engine.
Read the original → en.wikipedia.org
Get five bites like this every day.
Tezvyn delivers a daily feed of 60-second tech bites with quizzes to lock in what you learn.