Purpose of a Shared Definition of Done for Multiple Teams
This tests your ability to maintain quality and transparency across multiple teams. Explain that a shared Definition of Done ensures a consistent quality standard for a usable, integrated Increment, impacting testing by requiring integration and end-to-end…
WHAT THIS TESTS: This question tests your understanding of how to solve the practical engineering problem of integration and quality control when multiple teams contribute to one product. The interviewer isn't looking for a textbook definition. They want to see if you can connect an abstract agile concept (the DoD) to concrete outcomes: a transparent process, reduced integration risk, and a consistently high-quality, usable product Increment. It's a test of your ability to think about quality at a system level, not just a team level.
A GOOD ANSWER COVERS: An effective answer addresses four key points in order. First, its primary purpose is to create transparency and a shared quality standard for the entire product Increment. Second, it ensures that work from different teams integrates into a single, valuable, and potentially releasable state. Third, it directly impacts development practices by encouraging shared code ownership, common CI/CD pipelines, and consistent standards. Fourth, it dictates testing strategy, mandating cross-team testing like integration and end-to-end tests, rather than just team-local unit tests.
COMMON WRONG ANSWERS: Red flags include describing the DoD as just a checklist for a single team's work, completely missing the integration aspect. Another common mistake is confusing the Definition of Done (a quality standard for the product Increment) with Acceptance Criteria (scope requirements for a specific Product Backlog Item). Also, suggesting that a separate QA team is responsible for the final sign-off is an anti-pattern; the Scrum Teams are collectively responsible for meeting the DoD. Finally, failing to mention that the DoD is a living document, created and evolved by the teams themselves, suggests a lack of practical experience.
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS: Be prepared for follow-up questions like: "Who is responsible for creating and updating the shared DoD?" or "What happens if one team consistently fails to meet the shared DoD in a Sprint?" or "Tell me about a time a shared DoD was insufficient and caused a production issue. What did you learn?"
ONE CONCRETE EXAMPLE: Imagine two teams building an e-commerce app: Team Checkout and Team Search. A shared DoD ensures their work integrates. It might require that any new work must: 1) Pass all existing integration tests, plus new ones covering the interaction. 2) Maintain an overall API response time under 200ms at the 95th percentile. 3) Not decrease overall code coverage below 80%. 4) Be deployed behind a feature flag in the shared staging environment. If Team Search's new feature slows down the checkout API, their work is not 'Done' until they resolve the performance regression, even if their feature works perfectly in isolation.
Read the original → scrumguides.org
Get five bites like this every day.
Tezvyn delivers a daily feed of 60-second tech bites with quizzes to lock in what you learn.