Chartjunk: Less is More in Data Visualization
Chartjunk is visual noise in a graph that doesn't help the user understand the data, like 3D effects or decorative backgrounds. It's common in reports where aesthetics are prioritized over clarity.
WHY IT EXISTS The core problem chartjunk addresses is the tendency to prioritize aesthetics over clarity in data visualization. Default charting software often includes decorative elements, and creators mistakenly believe these make a chart look more impressive or professional, when in fact they obscure the underlying information.
THE MENTAL MODEL Think of the "data-to-ink ratio." Every bit of ink (or pixel) on a chart should be dedicated to representing data. Chartjunk is non-data-ink. Removing it clarifies the message, just like removing filler words from a sentence makes it stronger. Your goal is to help the viewer understand the data, not admire your design skills.
HOW IT WORKS Chartjunk includes any visual element that is not necessary to comprehend the information or that actively distracts the viewer. This can manifest as superfluous decorations like 3D effects on 2D data, gradients or patterns in bars, and distracting background images. It also includes chart clutter, such as heavy or excessive gridlines, redundant labels, and unnecessary tick marks. These elements force the viewer's brain to do extra work to filter out the noise and find the signal.
WHEN TO USE IT The term "chartjunk" is pejorative, meaning it's something to be avoided, not used. The goal is always to minimize or eliminate it for clear communication. The only arguable exception is in data art, where the primary goal is aesthetic expression rather than analytical insight. Even then, it's a fine line.
WHEN NOT TO USE IT Avoid chartjunk in any situation where clear, unambiguous communication of data is the priority. This includes scientific papers, business intelligence dashboards, financial reports, and any analytical context. If a visual element doesn't help someone interpret the data more easily or accurately, it should be removed.
ONE CANONICAL EXAMPLE A classic example is a 3D pie chart. The 3D perspective distorts the perceived size of the slices, making it impossible to compare them accurately. A slice in the foreground appears larger than an equally sized slice in the background. A simple 2D bar chart or even a flat 2D pie chart is a much clearer and more honest representation of the same data.
Read the original → en.wikipedia.org
Get five bites like this every day.
Tezvyn delivers a daily feed of 60-second tech bites with quizzes to lock in what you learn.