Rust
191 bites tagged Rust: interview questions with model answers, and 60-second explainers.
Test yourself: Top 30 Rust interview questions →Multiple choice, with the correct answer and why it is correct on every question. Free, no sign-in.Python summit recap: discussions shaping CPython
Python Insider has published its 2026 summit recap. Topics include free-threading, Rust and garbage collection. These discussions are not a Python release.
Cancellation and cleanup: Go context/errgroup vs Tokio
Go propagates cancellation via context.Context that goroutines must poll, with errgroup canceling siblings on first error; Tokio cancels by dropping futures, which stops them at await…
Implicit Go interfaces versus explicit Rust trait impls
Go's implicit satisfaction enables decoupling and retrofitting but hides who implements what and risks accidental conformance; Rust's explicit impls aid discovery, refactoring…
anyhow versus thiserror in Rust error handling
Anyhow gives one opaque dynamic error type for applications where you mostly propagate and report; thiserror derives concrete typed enums for libraries so callers can match on variants.
Go if err != nil versus Rust's ? operator
Go's explicit checks are verbose but make every error site visible; Rust's ? propagates concisely while still forcing the error into the type, reducing boilerplate.
Designing a logging abstraction: Go interfaces vs Rust traits
Define a Logger interface/trait with a write method; Go interfaces are always dynamically dispatched; Rust lets you choose static dispatch (impl Trait/generics) or…
Go slices versus Rust Vec growth and reallocation
Both are a (pointer, length, capacity) triple over a heap buffer that reallocates and copies on growth, roughly doubling; key difference is Go slices share backing arrays and have no ownership…
Go interfaces versus Rust traits and macros at scale
Go uses reflection over interface{} (e.g. encoding/json) for runtime flexibility; Rust uses traits plus derive/proc macros (e.g. serde) for compile-time, zero-cost code generation.
Go's mandatory runtime versus Rust's minimal runtime
Go ships a GC and goroutine scheduler in every binary, ideal for services; Rust has only a tiny runtime and no GC, enabling embedded, kernels, and WASM.
Go interface-constraint generics versus Rust trait bounds
Go constrains type parameters with interfaces and may use dictionaries/shape stenciling; Rust uses trait bounds with full monomorphization for zero-cost specialization.
Go (T, error) versus Rust Result for error handling
Go returns a separate error value you may ignore; Rust wraps success or error in one Result enum the compiler forces you to handle. Go favors simplicity, Rust favors compile-enforced safety.
Goroutines and channels versus ownership-based concurrency
Go uses cheap goroutines and CSP-style channels to coordinate by communication; Rust uses ownership plus Send/Sync to make data races a compile error.
Structural Go interfaces versus nominal Rust traits
Go interfaces are satisfied implicitly by method shape (structural); Rust traits must be explicitly implemented (nominal).
Criterion: the standard Rust benchmarking library
Criterion runs on stable Rust, collects many samples, applies statistical analysis with confidence intervals, and compares against saved baselines to detect regressions.
Rust lifetimes versus Go garbage-collected lifetimes
A lifetime is a compile-time region a reference is valid for; annotations like 'a relate input and output reference durations; Go instead uses garbage collection and escape analysis.
Fearless concurrency: Rust compile-time vs Go runtime
Rust uses ownership plus Send/Sync to reject data races at compile time; Go encourages channels but still allows races, with the runtime race detector catching them at test…
Why Pin is needed for self-referential Futures
Async blocks compile to state machines that can hold references into their own storage; Pin guarantees the value will not move so those internal pointers stay valid across polls.
Architecting an L7 proxy in Go versus Rust
Go offers GC and cheap goroutines for fast delivery but tail-latency GC pauses; Rust offers ownership and async/await for predictable latency at higher complexity.
Rust Send and Sync marker traits explained
Send means a value can move across threads, Sync means a reference can be shared; Rc uses non-atomic refcounts, Arc uses atomic ones.
Static dispatch over Write with generics in Rust
Write generically over the std::io::Write trait with a type parameter W: Write, letting the compiler monomorphize and inline per concrete type, avoiding the vtable indirection of Box<dyn Write>.
Handling Result and errors in a Rust web handler
Handler returns Result, the ? operator early-returns errors, a custom error type implements IntoResponse to map to 500, success returns 200 with data.
Building a safe Rust wrapper over an unsafe C API
Hide extern calls behind a safe module, own the resource in a struct with Drop calling the C free, return Result mapping C error codes, use NewType/NonNull and PhantomData.
Passing Go/Rust callbacks to a C library
C needs a plain function pointer; in Go use //export with cgo, in Rust an extern "C" fn; carry state via a void* user-data param.
Rust references vs raw pointers
References are borrow-checked, always valid, aliasing-controlled, non-null; raw pointers carry no guarantees, can be null, dangling, or aliased, and dereferencing needs unsafe.
Get Rust bites daily.
Five a day, five minutes, offline. With quizzes so it sticks.
The iPhone app is on the way
We are building it. Until it lands, nothing here is held back from you: every interview card, your saved cards, streaks and the job board all work in Safari, plus hundreds of free practice quizzes of thirty questions each. Sign in and it all carries over to the app the day it arrives.
Want it as an icon? Tap Share at the bottom of Safari, then Add to Home Screen. It opens full screen and the cards you have read stay available offline.