Interview questions in Go & Rust, page 2
How does struct field ordering affect memory layout in Go and Rust?
It tests alignment, padding, and compiler layout knowledge. A strong answer explains that alignment inserts padding, Go and Rust keep declared order, and reordering by size can shrink size. Red flag: saying order is irrelevant or that compiler auto-packs.
Compare enum vs trait objects for heterogeneous shapes in Rust
This tests compile-time vs run-time polymorphism in Rust. A strong answer contrasts enum's closed set, static dispatch, and stack layout against trait objects' open extensibility, heap allocation, and vtable indirection.
How do Go and Rust control visibility of functions and types?
Tests encapsulation conventions in systems languages. Go uses capitalization: uppercase exports across packages; Rust uses explicit pub keywords with module-level privacy. Red flag: claiming either uses Java-style access modifiers or runtime visibility.
Go package declaration, directory name, and import path relationship
Tests Go's separation of directory layout and package identity. A good answer states: import path is module path plus subdirectory; package clause is the in-code name; mismatch is legal and common for main or tests.
Why does Go forbid circular dependencies, and how do you resolve them?
Cycles break incremental compilation; resolve by moving logic down, merging coupled packages, or using dependency injection.
Rust binary and library crates in one project
A binary crate has main and produces an executable; a library crate has lib.rs and is reusable; put logic in the lib and a thin main that calls it.
What is the purpose of the internal directory in Go?
Tests Go visibility boundaries beyond exported vs unexported. A strong answer states that internal is compiler-enforced module privacy, while lowercase is only package-private. Red flag: calling internal a naming convention rather than a build boundary.
Explain the difference between mod and use in Rust
Mod tells the compiler to compile a file into the crate tree; use brings an existing path into scope as a shortcut.
Rust workspace versus single crate for plugins
A workspace gives incremental compilation, enforced API boundaries via a shared api crate, and per-plugin deps; a single crate is simpler but recompiles wholesale and blurs boundaries.
Describe Go's memory management, garbage collection, and trade-offs
Explain Go's GC recycles heap memory, the compiler stack-allocates locals, and automatic collection costs runtime overhead.
Explain Rust's Ownership and its three compiler-enforced rules
Tests your grasp of Rust's compile-time memory model. A strong answer lists the three ownership rules, links them to stack versus heap, and notes borrow checking enforces them at compile time. Red flag: calling it manual memory management.
Why are Rust's borrowing rules stricter than Go's pointers?
This tests compile-time versus runtime safety tradeoffs. A strong answer contrasts Go's aliasing with Rust's rule of one mutable or many immutable references to prevent data races without a GC. A red flag is calling Rust strict without citing race prevention.
Rust borrow rules versus Go race prevention
Rust's aliasing-XOR-mutability rule plus Send and Sync make races a compile error; Go prevents them at runtime via channels, mutexes and the race detector.
How does Rust ownership avoid Go GC's non-deterministic pauses?
Tests if you know Rust's compile-time ownership eliminates GC pauses by making deallocation deterministic at scope boundaries. A strong answer contrasts Go's STW with Rust's immediate Drop and zero-cost compile-time checks.
Explain Go escape analysis and Rust ownership for stack vs heap
Tests compiler-driven memory placement. Go escape analysis keeps non-escaping locals on stack, shrinking heap and GC work. Rust ownership lets the compiler pick stack or heap at build time with zero cost.
Explain Rust Rc and Arc versus Go's tracing GC
This tests deterministic reference counting versus tracing GC. A strong answer contrasts Rc's heap reference counts with Go's root tracing, and notes Rc cannot reclaim cycles while Go's GC can. Red flag: claiming Rc has no cycle leak risk.
Rust unsafe FFI vs Cgo: who owns memory safety?
Tests your grasp of where compiler guarantees end at the FFI boundary. A strong answer contrasts Rust raw-pointer validity and aliasing invariants in unsafe blocks against Cgo's automatic copying, pointer-passing restrictions, and runtime thread-switching…
How do you idiomatically return a recoverable error and result in Go?
This tests Go's multiple-return error idiom. A strong answer gives a (T, error) signature with error last, returns nil on success, and checks err before using the result. A red flag is suggesting panic for recoverable errors or pointer out-parameters.
What are Rust Result's variants and how does the compiler enforce handling?
This tests Rust's explicit error model. A strong answer names Ok(T) and Err(E), explains must_use warns when Results are ignored, and notes pattern matching or ? is required to extract values.
Rust's operator equivalent to Go's if err != nil return err
Tests if you know Rust's ? operator for error propagation. A strong answer names ?, explains it returns Err from the function via Result's Try and FromResidual traits, and unwraps Ok. Red flag: calling it .unwrap() or suggesting manual match is idiomatic.
We are hiring for this. Every open role lists the topics its interview covers, so you can prepare for the real thing rather than guessing.
See open roles