How do you quantify the cost of not addressing technical debt?
Tests your ability to translate technical issues into business impact. A good answer quantifies the slowdown, calculates the 'tax' on new features, and proposes a specific, time-boxed plan. A red flag is complaining about the PO without providing data.
This question tests your ability to translate technical problems into measurable business impact and collaborate with product. A strong answer quantifies the slowdown (e.g., 'feature X took 30% longer'), calculates the 'tech debt tax' on future work, proposes a specific, time-boxed refactoring effort, and frames the decision in terms of long-term velocity and predictability. Avoid simply stating code is 'bad' or demanding a 'tech debt sprint' without data on its impact to feature delivery.
Read the original → mountaingoatsoftware.com
- #agile
- #product-management
- #technical-debt
- #prioritization
- #influence
Get five bites like this every day.
Tezvyn delivers a daily feed of 60-second tech bites with quizzes to lock in what you learn.