Easy interview questions in Agile & Scrum, page 3
Sprint Retrospective: What's the output and what happens next?
This tests if you see Scrum as an action-oriented framework. A good answer identifies concrete improvement items as the output and explains that the most impactful one is added to the next Sprint Backlog as a formal work item.
What is the output of a Sprint Retrospective, and what happens next?
This tests if you create actionable outcomes, not just vent. The output is a plan to improve quality and effectiveness, with the most impactful items added to the next Sprint Backlog. A red flag is calling the output just 'notes' with no plan for integration.
Describe the Red-Green-Refactor cycle in TDD. What is each step's purpose?
This checks if you understand TDD as a design discipline, not just testing. A strong answer maps Red to a failing test defining the interface, Green to minimal passing code, and Refactor to cleaning both codebases without changing behavior.
Describe the Red-Green-Refactor cycle in Test-Driven Development
This tests your grasp of TDD's core loop and its design benefits. Outline the cycle: Red (failing test), Green (minimal code to pass), and Refactor (clean up). Mention creating a test list first. A red flag is ignoring the critical Refactor step.
Describe the TDD Red-Green-Refactor cycle
This tests your grasp of TDD's core loop and its design implications. A good answer defines Red (failing test), Green (minimal code to pass), and Refactor (improve structure).
What user story details reveal the customer problem?
This tests if you see stories as problem placeholders, not specs. A strong answer asks for user role, action, 'so that' value, and confirmation criteria while demanding conversation. Red flag: listing technical tasks without mentioning the customer problem.
What do you need in a user story beyond technical requirements?
This tests your product sense. A great answer asks for the user persona, the 'why' behind the request, and measurable success metrics. A red flag is focusing only on technical implementation details without understanding the core user problem.
What information do you need in a user story?
This tests your ability to connect engineering work to user value. A great answer covers the user persona (who), their motivation (why), and measurable success criteria (what), explaining how this context informs technical decisions.
Describe your role as an engineer in story refinement
Mention feasibility probes, acceptance criteria checks, and splitting for forecast clarity.
Describe your role in user story refinement.
This tests your understanding of refinement as a collaborative de-risking process. A great answer details your role in clarifying requirements, identifying technical risks, breaking down work, and providing estimates. A red flag is passively receiving tasks.
What is an engineer's role in story refinement?
Tests your role in translating needs to tech specs. A great answer covers clarifying questions, task breakdown, sizing, and acceptance criteria. A red flag is passively waiting for tasks instead of proactively de-risking the work.
Describe the initial columns for a new Kanban board and their purpose
Tests whether you understand Kanban as a flow visualization tool. A strong answer names Backlog, To Do, In Progress, and Done, explaining each as a handoff or state change. Red flag: adding too many columns upfront or conflating the board with Scrum.
What columns would you set up on a new Kanban board?
Tests your grasp of workflow visualization, not just Agile terms. A good answer starts with To Do/In Progress/Done, then adds columns like Code Review to mirror the real process, and crucially, mentions setting WIP limits to manage flow and identify…
What initial columns would you set up on a Kanban board?
Tests your grasp of Kanban's core goal: visualizing workflow. Start with a simple board (To Do, In Progress, Done), explaining how each column represents a work state. A red flag is creating an overly complex board without justifying the need for each stage.
Lead Time vs Cycle Time in Kanban and measuring Cycle Time
Tests whether you distinguish customer wait time from active work. Strong answer: Lead Time is request-to-delivery with queues; Cycle Time is active start-to-finish measured from In Progress to Done. Red flag: treating them as synonyms or ignoring wait states.
Explain Lead Time vs. Cycle Time on a Kanban board
This tests your grasp of core Kanban flow metrics. Define Lead Time (customer request to delivery) and Cycle Time (work start to finish). Measure Cycle Time from the first 'In Progress' column to 'Done'. Red flag: defining terms without explaining their value.
Lead Time vs. Cycle Time in Kanban
Tests your understanding of core Kanban metrics for process improvement. Define Lead Time (request to delivery) and Cycle Time (work start to completion), noting Cycle Time is a subset. A red flag is confusing the two or being imprecise about start/end points.
What is a Scrum of Scrums purpose and what technical info is shared?
Multi-team sync for blockers, dependencies, API changes, integration risks; not a status meeting.
What is a Scrum of Scrums, and what do you share there?
Tests your understanding of scaling agile and representing your team's technical risks. A good answer defines it as a coordination meeting, not a status report, and focuses on sharing/receiving info on cross-team dependencies and blockers.
What is a Scrum of Scrums and what's shared there?
This tests your understanding of scaling Agile. A good answer defines it as a coordination meeting for multiple teams, focusing on sharing inter-team blockers, dependencies, and integration points, not just status.
We are hiring for this. Every open role lists the topics its interview covers, so you can prepare for the real thing rather than guessing.
See open roles