More in Agile & Scrum — page 12
What is the Definition of Ready for a backlog item?
Tests your grasp of upstream quality gates in Agile. Define DoR as a team's checklist for sprint-ready items, explain it protects dev focus and predictability, and give examples like clear acceptance criteria.
How do you handle an urgent, mid-sprint stakeholder request?
Tests your understanding of Scrum roles and stakeholder management. First, acknowledge the request's urgency. Then, redirect the stakeholder to the Product Owner, who manages all new work. A red flag is saying 'yes' and derailing the sprint, or a flat 'no'.
Scrum Empiricism: Retro and Definition of Done
This tests your grasp of Scrum theory beyond mechanics. A great answer links the Definition of Done to transparency, the Retrospective to inspection, and the Retro's output to adaptation. A red flag is confusing the Sprint Review with the Retrospective.
How does the Sprint container enable empiricism and protect developers?
This tests your grasp of the Sprint's structural role in Scrum. A good answer defines the Sprint as a fixed-length container for all events, explains how this cadence enables empiricism, and how the Sprint Goal protects developers.
How do you handle an urgent mid-sprint feature request?
This tests your understanding of Scrum roles and protecting the Sprint Goal. A great answer redirects the stakeholder to the Product Owner, who then assesses the request's impact and negotiates with the team if it can be swapped in without harming the Sprint…
How does a team forecast work for a Sprint?
This tests if you know the Developers own the forecast, not the PO or SM. A good answer cites past performance, current capacity, and the Product Backlog as inputs. A red flag is saying the Product Owner dictates the work.
Relationship Between Product Backlog, Sprint Backlog, and Increment
This tests your understanding of Scrum artifacts as commitments to goals, not just to-do lists. Define the Product Backlog (Product Goal), Sprint Backlog (Sprint Goal), and Increment (Definition of Done), then trace an item's flow.
What is the purpose of Sprint Review vs. Sprint Retrospective?
This tests your grasp of Scrum's distinct feedback loops. The Review inspects the product Increment with stakeholders to adapt the Product Backlog. The Retrospective inspects the team's process with the Scrum Team only.
Describe the purpose of the Daily Scrum
Tests if you know the Daily Scrum is a planning event for Developers, not a status report. A good answer states it's a 15-min meeting to inspect progress toward the Sprint Goal and adapt the Sprint Backlog.
What are the three Scrum accountabilities and their focus?
Tests recall of Scrum's core team structure and how the roles create a self-managing unit. A good answer names the Product Owner (value), Developers (Increment), and Scrum Master (process) and defines their focus.
How would you implement an Andon Cord for a software team?
Tests your grasp of CI/CD, quality, and team culture. A great answer defines a trigger (broken main build), a technical block (stop merges), and a cultural response (team swarms). A red flag is scheduling the fix or blaming an individual.
How would you identify and elevate a team's primary constraint?
This tests your systems thinking beyond local optimization. A great answer follows the 5 Focusing Steps: Identify, Exploit, Subordinate, Elevate, Repeat. A red flag is jumping to 'hire more people' before exploiting the existing constraint and subordinating…
Relate Lean's 'Build Quality In' to TDD and CI
This tests your ability to connect historical Lean principles to modern software development. Explain Jidoka as "stop the line," then frame TDD and CI as its software equivalents that prevent defects from propagating.
Agile Change vs. Chaos: Technical Enablers
Tests if you know Agile is disciplined, not chaotic. A great answer contrasts structured, time-boxed change with reactive chaos, then details technical enablers like CI/CD and loose coupling. A red flag is equating Agile with no planning.
Explain Muda (Waste) with three software development examples
Tests your ability to apply Lean's 'Muda' (waste) concept to software. A good answer defines Muda, then gives 3 examples like partially done work or extra features, with specific mitigations like WIP limits or YAGNI. A red flag is giving generic examples.
How do you decide the right level of project documentation?
This tests your pragmatism beyond literal Agile interpretation. A great answer defines docs as a product for a specific user, ties value to reducing future work, and proposes a tiered approach. A red flag is treating all documentation as pure overhead.
Explain the Agile principle of Simplicity and how you apply it.
This tests your ability to connect Agile theory to engineering practice. A good answer defines simplicity as maximizing work not done, applies YAGNI with a concrete example (e.g., phased feature rollout), and links it to business value.
Goal of a Retrospective and Continuous Improvement
Tests if you see process improvement as a core engineering duty. A great answer defines the retro's goal (inspect & adapt the process), its output (actionable items for the next Sprint), and its role as the engine of continuous improvement.
Individuals & Interactions Over Processes & Tools: Explain This Value
Tests your grasp of Agile's core philosophy: empowering people over rigid systems. A great answer defines the principle, links it to cross-functional team structures, and champions direct communication over ticket-passing.
AI Turns Specs Into a Programming Language
Spec-Driven Development (SDD) reframes specs as a higher-level programming language for AI agents, not just pre-coding docs. This shifts engineering work from implementation details to defining intent and constraints.